Art in New York City
I had the great opportunity of visiting the Metropolitan
Museum of Art (MET) located in
Manhattan, New York. Upon approaching,the first thing I noticed
was the huge stairs that led up to
the entrance of the museum that was surrounded by
water fountains. Once inside the museum lobby,
I noticed a huge statue of a
Pharaoh. It was extremely crowded with a copious amount of people and
one guy was actually
sketching out one of the art pieces.
One of many
things that I found interesting and rather enjoyed was that admission to the
museum only required a donation of any amount which is great because you get to
view numerous art pieces on a budget. I felt rather privileged that I had the chance
to visualize all the great art pieces that I have heard several people talk about while growing up as a child.
The museum
was bigger than I anticipated so I found myself lost and had to ask the workers
where I could locate the pieces of art that I was interested in finding because
I am horrible at reading maps. Once I was pointed in the right direction, I
began finding myself getting distracted by other statues, paintings, and
artifacts.
As I roamed
from gallery to gallery, I was blown away by how impressive the art pieces were. Don’t
get me wrong, they are amazing when you see them on television but a whole
different story when they are directly in front of you.
Due to the
nature of my visit, majority of my time was spent with four art pieces that really drew my attention. If I can recall correctly, the first piece I saw was the statue
of Aphrodite which is a roman marble statue. When I approached her I saw a nude
lady with curly hair that was elegantly styled in a bun positioned in the rear
of her head. She is an example of a sculpture in –the-round.
Parts of her
nose, lips, and both arms were missing. Her left breast was noticeably lower than
her right breast and the left nipple was protruded out more than the right. I
noticed that she was standing with her right leg slightly bent and her left foot
positioned forward. I got the vibe that maybe she was trying to look away from
something that she didn’t want to see. Maybe something unpleasant or something
that ticks her nerves.
According to
ancient Greeks, Aphrodite was considered a youthful, beautiful goddess who was
associated with life, fertility, and love. She was frequently used as a subject
matter in both Greek and Roman art. She was also considered the goddess of
warfare by the Assyrians and Babylonians. Statues of Aphrodite were worshipped
often by the Greek warriors prior to going into battle. She was seen as a
symbol for all that the men were fighting for in order to satisfy their honor
and the need to protect their property.
The Greeks
quickly grew famous for showing Aphrodite in the nude, however, they did not
start out by posing her in such a way.
I found her missing arms to be
intriguing whether it was an accident or not. According to the MET, her arms
originally reached forward to shield her breasts and pubic hair that concealed
her sexuality. I suppose that would make sense since she is stamped as being a
goddess of love and not lust. During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries,
Aphrodite was considered "one of the finest ancient sculptures in existence", says
the MET.
The second
piece I saw was the Fragment of a Byzantine Floor Mosaic with Personification
of Ktisis. This piece is dated at 500 – 550 A.D. and the style is mosaic coming
from a Byzantine culture. When I first saw this piece, it actually frightened
me a bit because it is placed on a wall and as soon as you turn the corner all
I saw were these big bright beautiful eyes. Once I got passed how exaggerated
her eyes were, I was immediately drawn to the elegantly jeweled lady who
appears to be ignoring the man on her right who appeared to be determined to
offer her a gift.
This artwork displays hierarchy of scale. I
also noticed that the word “KTT” is placed in the upper center of the piece. At
first, I thought that maybe it is an abbreviation for Ktisis, but later on I
learned that it’s a Greek word meaning “good” which might imply that he is a
man with an acceptable character. This specific work of art reminds me of
several couples that I am fortunate to know. This mosaic love story depicts
some films I have also had the opportunity to see. However, her eyes remind me
of a girl that I went to high school with who was teased because her eyes were
the center of attention.
What I love about this piece is the
pretty color sequence. Mostly darker tones were used like browns and beige. I
saw red but it appears very washed out and I’m not sure if this was purposely
done or the colors faded over time.
According to the MET, this bust of a
richly bejeweled woman stares from the fragment of a floor mosaic that was once
part of a large public building. The Greek word inscripted near her head that
was mentioned earlier identifies her as Ktisis which represents the act of
generous donation or foundation. Her role is emphasized much like her eyes as
she holds the measuring tool for the Roman foot with the upper end in her right
hand and the lower end in her left hand. The man positioned on her right side
extends a cornucopia toward her as if he is offering her a gift.
Overall, this piece of art gives me a
traditional, earthy vibe. This art work would be a perfect accessory to a
thanksgiving feast with family and friends.
Thirdly, I saw Madonna and child. The
artist of this piece is Duccio di Buoninsegna and the date is circa 1290 -1300.
It comes from the Renaissance period and is tempra and gold on wood. This work
of art displays a lady holding a child while looking pretty empty headed or
like she is overthinking something. I think that she is either sad about
something or a lot is going through her mind. If I were to just glance at this
painting and did not have the name, I would have immediately guessed that the
lady is the Virgin Mary holding her baby Jesus.
According to Christian beliefs, The
Madonna actually represents the Virgin Mary and the child represents baby
Jesus. The Madonna is shown wearing a huge, dark blue cloak with a golden
interior lining that covers most of her body. To show her modesty, the only
visible parts of her body that could be seen are her face, neck, and hands that have
an unrealistic elongated and skinny appearance to them.
The child appears to be wearing an
orange – red colored robe representing power that covers most of his body. He
is seated on top of his mothers left arm. Although it’s rather strange that he
is suppose to be a child, his face is adult like.
The Madonna’s eyes look extremely
empty and sad as if she is without a soul and maybe a tad bit annoyed at the
baby for pulling on her veil.
I appreciated the grungy look of this
painting but I have to say that this has to be my least favorite piece of art. It finds to remind me of my adolescent years witnessing my
mother suffering from depression. Her face would often display a flat
affect similar to the one the Madonna had on hers.
According to the MET, the Christ
child is pushing away the veil of his mother that obstructed his view of her.
The faceful expression reflects her knowledge of his crucifixion that is going
to happen later on down the road.
Finally, the last piece I viewed was
Mars a Venus United by Love. This is one of my favorite pieces. The artist is
Paolo Veronese dated back to 1570. This is an oil painting that definitely does
not disappoint.
The colors in this Renaissance
painting are extremely rich and vibrant. The blending is out of this world.
Immediately when I saw it hanging in the gallery, I wished that it was hanging
in my family living room.
I noticed two babies with wings on
their backs at the bottom of the painting. My first guess would be that cupid
is embracing the left lower leg of the woman named Venus while the man named
Mars is supporting the same leg.
When I looked really closely at this
painting, I noticed the cupid that was located on the right had created some sort
of barrier for the horse in order for the animal not to get by. I believe this is
symbolic for keeping violence and war away and to just live in love and peace
with each other.
The horse is probably the horse that
Mars fights battles with. I noticed that the horse is painted a blackish color
to emphasize fear and his physique is strong and profound. I would not want to
get on that horses bad side at all.
Venus is portrayed in the nude while
at the same time is attempting to maintain her modesty by covering her right
breast with her right hand while Mars covers her pubic area by holding some
sort of cloth with his right hand.
Mars is wearing a purple cloak which
gives me the idea that he is well respected in his war surroundings and holds
some type of superior status to his peers. Venus embraces Mars as she rests her
left arm across his upper back as they both appear to be paying close attention
to the cupid of love below. That is my interpretation but according to the MET,
cupid is binding Mars to Venus with a love knot.
By 1621, it was owned by Emperor
Rudolf III along with three other works by the artist but the original owner is
unknown.
Work cited:
1. Tompkins, Calvin. Merchants & Masterpieces: The Story of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Henry Holt and Company, New York. 2012.
2. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin. www.metmuseum.org. September 19, 2017